Disinformation in the Age of Trump
Sections Of The Veto That Damned America:
Disinformation in the Age of Trump
Birthers
The birther movement was a conspiracy theory that falsely claimed former President Barack Obama was not born in the United States and was therefore ineligible to serve as president. It emerged during Obama's 2008 presidential campaign and persisted throughout his presidency, fueled by some political opponents and individuals who questioned Obama's legitimacy as president.
The movement alleged that Obama was actually born in Kenya, his father's home country, rather than in Hawaii, where he was actually born according to his birth certificate. Despite the release of Obama's long-form birth certificate in 2011, which confirmed his birth in Hawaii, and the overwhelming evidence supporting his citizenship, the birther movement continued to persist among some fringe groups.
Critics argued that the birther movement was racially motivated, aimed at delegitimizing the first African American president of the United States. The conspiracy theory gained traction in certain circles but was widely debunked by mainstream media outlets and political figures. Despite its debunking, the birther movement remains a notable example of how conspiracy theories can influence public discourse and political narratives.
Rush Limbaugh, a conservative talk radio host, was connected to the birther movement through his commentary and discussion on his radio show. While Limbaugh did not originate the birther conspiracy theory, he did discuss it on his program and provided a platform for its promotion and dissemination.
Limbaugh's influential radio show reached millions of listeners, many of whom were conservative-leaning individuals. Through his commentary and discussions, Limbaugh lent credibility to the birther movement among his audience, contributing to its spread and influence within conservative circles.
Alex Jones, a well-known conspiracy theorist and founder of Infowars, was connected to the birther movement primarily through his media platforms and vocal support for the conspiracy theory. Jones used his radio show, website, and other media channels to promote the false claim that Barack Obama was not born in the United States and therefore was not eligible to serve as president.
Jones amplified birther conspiracy theories to his audience, often presenting them alongside other fringe ideas and promoting them as part of a broader narrative of government deception and corruption. His influence in alternative media circles allowed the birther movement to gain traction among his followers and beyond.
While Jones may not have been a central figure in the origin of the birther movement, his role in amplifying and perpetuating the conspiracy theory contributed to its spread and persistence in certain segments of the population. Jones provided a platform for birtherism and helped to shape the narrative around Obama's citizenship among conspiracy-minded individuals.
Donald Trump played a significant role in the birther movement, becoming one of its most prominent and vocal proponents. He repeatedly and falsely claimed that Barack Obama was not born in the United States and therefore ineligible to be president. Trump's involvement in the birther movement gained momentum in the years leading up to his own presidential campaign in 2016.
As early as 2011, Trump began publicly questioning Obama's birthplace, demanding to see the president's long-form birth certificate. Trump's vocal advocacy for the birther conspiracy theory helped to mainstream it and gave it a prominent platform in public discourse.
In April 2011, Obama released his long-form birth certificate, which confirmed that he was born in Hawaii. However, Trump continued to cast doubt on Obama's citizenship, suggesting that the certificate may have been forged or otherwise invalid.
Trump's involvement in the birther movement helped to fuel speculation and misinformation about Obama's background and eligibility to serve as president. Although Trump eventually acknowledged Obama's citizenship during his 2016 presidential campaign, his earlier promotion of birtherism remains a controversial and widely criticized aspect of his political career.
Disinformation played a significant role in fueling the birther movement by spreading false claims and conspiracy theories about Barack Obama's citizenship and eligibility to serve as president. Here's how disinformation contributed to the birther movement:
False Claims about Obama's Birthplace: Disinformation campaigns falsely asserted that Obama was not born in the United States but instead in Kenya or another foreign country. Despite ample evidence, including Obama's birth certificate, confirming his birth in Hawaii, these false claims persisted and were disseminated widely, particularly through fringe media outlets and online platforms.
Manipulation of Evidence: Disinformation efforts often manipulated or misrepresented evidence to support the birther narrative. For example, conspiracy theorists questioned the authenticity of Obama's birth certificate, suggesting it was forged or tampered with, despite multiple verifications of its validity by state officials and independent fact-checkers.
Echo Chambers and Confirmation Bias: Disinformation thrived in echo chambers where individuals with similar beliefs reinforced each other's views. Social media platforms and online forums allowed birther conspiracy theorists to find like-minded individuals, leading to the amplification and reinforcement of false narratives through confirmation bias.
Partisan Media and Political Rhetoric: Some partisan media outlets and political figures promoted birtherism to undermine Obama's presidency or gain political advantage. By perpetuating false claims about Obama's citizenship, these actors sought to delegitimize his presidency and appeal to their base of supporters.
Lack of Fact-Checking and Critical Thinking: Disinformation thrived in an environment where fact-checking was lacking, and critical thinking was undermined. Many individuals uncritically accepted false claims about Obama's citizenship without verifying the evidence or considering alternative viewpoints.
Overall, disinformation campaigns exploited distrust in mainstream institutions and media, capitalizing on partisan divides and fostering an environment conducive to conspiracy theories like birtherism. These efforts contributed to the persistence and widespread acceptance of false narratives about Obama's citizenship, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
2011: Fairness Doctrine Officially Killed Off
In 2011, the Fairness Doctrine was officially eliminated from FCC regulations. This doctrine, which had its share of both advocates and critics, aimed to ensure discussion over the airwaves of controversial issues did not exclude any particular point of view. However, by the mid-1980s, most broadcasters objected to it as an “overly burdensome” infringement on free speech, especially with the growth of the media industry. The FCC had stopped enforcing the policy entirely in 1987, and in 2011, the last nail was put into the coffin for this decades-old media-industry rule. So, while there were attempts to revive it, the Fairness Doctrine did not make a comeback in 2011.
The debate surrounding the Fairness Doctrine in 2011 included:
Background:
The Fairness Doctrine was a policy implemented by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in the United States.
It required broadcasters to provide balanced coverage of controversial issues by presenting contrasting viewpoints.
However, by the mid-1980s, most broadcasters considered it an infringement on free speech and objected to its enforcement.
Repeal and Abandonment:
In 1987, the FCC officially abolished the Fairness Doctrine.
Although the rule was removed, the language implementing it remained in place.
The doctrine had two main elements:
Broadcasters were required to devote airtime to discussing controversial matters of public interest.
They had to air contrasting views on those matters.
However, the doctrine applied only to broadcast licensees, not cable television channels like Fox News.
2011 and the Final Removal:
In 2011, the FCC removed the rule that implemented the Fairness Doctrine from the Federal Register.
This action effectively eliminated any remaining vestiges of the doctrine.
Despite attempts to revive it, the Fairness Doctrine did not make a comeback.
Misconceptions:
Some claim that the demise of the Fairness Doctrine paved the way for the creation of Fox News.
However, this assertion overlooks crucial distinctions between broadcast and cable television.
Fox News, being a cable channel, would likely never have been constrained by the doctrine’s requirements.
In summary, the Fairness Doctrine’s removal in 2011 marked the end of an era in broadcasting regulation, but its impact on media polarization and diversity remains a topic of ongoing debate.
The Birth of “Alternative Facts”
The phenomenon of "alternative facts" and the proliferation of misinformation in right-leaning news organizations leading up to Donald Trump's announcement of his presidential campaign in 2015 can be attributed to several factors, including changes in media consumption habits, the rise of partisan news outlets, and the political polarization of American society. Here's a breakdown of some key factors that contributed to the dissemination of "alternative facts":
1. Fragmentation of Media Landscape:
- The proliferation of digital media and the internet led to the fragmentation of the media landscape, with audiences increasingly turning to partisan news sources that catered to their ideological preferences. Right-leaning news organizations capitalized on this trend by offering content that reinforced conservative viewpoints and narratives, sometimes at the expense of accuracy and objectivity.
2. Erosion of Trust in Mainstream Media:
- Many conservatives became disillusioned with mainstream media outlets, which they perceived as biased against conservative viewpoints. Right-leaning news organizations positioned themselves as alternatives to mainstream media, presenting themselves as more trustworthy and reliable sources of information for conservative audiences.
3. Rise of Partisan News Outlets:
- The rise of partisan news outlets, such as Fox News and Breitbart News, provided platforms for conservative commentators and journalists to promote their perspectives and narratives. These outlets often prioritized sensationalism and ideological conformity over factual accuracy, leading to the spread of misinformation and "alternative facts."
4. Echo Chambers and Filter Bubbles:
- Social media platforms and online news websites contributed to the creation of echo chambers and filter bubbles, where users were exposed to content that reinforced their existing beliefs and viewpoints. This facilitated the spread of misinformation and "alternative facts" within ideologically homogeneous online communities.
5. Normalization of Conspiracy Theories:
- Right-leaning news organizations played a role in mainstreaming conspiracy theories and fringe narratives, which were often promoted as legitimate alternatives to mainstream explanations. This normalization of conspiracy theories contributed to a climate of distrust and skepticism toward established institutions and factual reporting.
6. Politicians as Media Figures:
- Politicians, including Donald Trump, leveraged their media platforms and celebrity status to disseminate misinformation and shape public opinion. Trump's background as a reality television star and his mastery of social media allowed him to bypass traditional media gatekeepers and communicate directly with his supporters, often spreading falsehoods and "alternative facts" in the process.
Overall, the dissemination of "alternative facts" leading up to Trump's announcement of his presidential campaign in 2015 was facilitated by a combination of technological, cultural, and political factors. Right-leaning news organizations played a central role in promoting partisan narratives and shaping public discourse, contributing to the erosion of trust in factual reporting and the proliferation of misinformation in American politics.
Foreign Actors
Foreign actors, particularly Russian entities, used various tactics to undermine the 2016 United States Presidential election through disinformation campaigns. Here are some ways in which they did so:
Social Media Manipulation: Russian operatives, including the Internet Research Agency (IRA), created and operated fake social media accounts on platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. These accounts spread divisive content, including false information, conspiracy theories, and inflammatory memes aimed at sowing discord among American voters.
Fake News Websites: Russian operatives also created and disseminated fake news articles on websites designed to mimic legitimate news outlets. These articles often contained fabricated or misleading information about candidates, political issues, and current events, designed to influence public opinion and undermine trust in the media.
Hacked Emails: Russian hackers targeted political organizations, including the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and Hillary Clinton's campaign chairman, John Podesta. They stole thousands of emails and released them through platforms like WikiLeaks. While the content of the emails did not necessarily contain damning information, their release was strategically timed to coincide with key moments in the election cycle, creating negative media coverage and fueling speculation.
Targeted Advertising: Russian operatives used targeted advertising on social media platforms to reach specific demographics with tailored messaging designed to influence their political beliefs or behavior. These ads often promoted divisive or inflammatory content related to hot-button issues like race, immigration, and gun control.
Disinformation Campaigns: Russian operatives engaged in coordinated disinformation campaigns aimed at amplifying existing divisions within American society and exacerbating political polarization. They exploited cultural, racial, and ideological fault lines to deepen societal rifts and undermine confidence in democratic institutions.
Overall, foreign actors used a combination of tactics, including social media manipulation, fake news dissemination, hacked emails, targeted advertising, and disinformation campaigns, to interfere in the 2016 U.S. Presidential election and undermine the integrity of the democratic process.
See:
QAnon
The QAnon movement emerged in 2017 with the spread of a complex and baseless conspiracy theory that alleges a secret cabal of Satan-worshipping pedophiles controls the world, including many powerful figures in politics, entertainment, and business. The movement centers around "Q," an anonymous online persona claiming to have insider knowledge of this supposed deep-state conspiracy. QAnon followers believe that President Donald Trump is secretly fighting against this cabal and that there will eventually be a reckoning known as "The Storm," where the conspirators will be arrested and brought to justice.
The rise of the QAnon movement can be attributed to several factors:
Social Media and Online Platforms: QAnon gained traction and spread rapidly through social media platforms, online forums, and message boards. Its decentralized nature allowed it to evade traditional fact-checking and moderation efforts, enabling it to proliferate unchecked.
Cultural and Political Polarization: QAnon thrived in an environment of increasing political polarization, distrust in institutions, and widespread anxiety about societal issues. It provided a simplistic and conspiratorial explanation for complex problems, appealing to individuals who felt marginalized or disillusioned with mainstream politics.
Confirmation Bias and Echo Chambers: QAnon followers often exist within self-reinforcing online echo chambers where they are exposed only to information that confirms their beliefs. This confirmation bias reinforces their commitment to the conspiracy theory and makes them resistant to contradictory evidence.
Apocalyptic and Messianic Elements: The QAnon narrative includes apocalyptic and messianic elements, such as the belief in an imminent "Storm" that will bring about a dramatic transformation of society. These elements can be compelling to individuals seeking meaning or purpose in tumultuous times.
The dangers of the QAnon movement are significant and multifaceted:
Spread of Misinformation: QAnon promotes baseless conspiracy theories and false information, which can have real-world consequences. It spreads harmful narratives about individuals and institutions, leading to harassment, threats, and violence.
Radicalization and Extremism: QAnon has been linked to radicalization and recruitment into extremist movements. Its conspiratorial worldview can lead followers down a rabbit hole of increasingly extreme beliefs, potentially leading to violent actions or acts of domestic terrorism.
Undermining Trust in Institutions: QAnon erodes trust in democratic institutions, mainstream media, and established sources of information. This erosion of trust can have long-term consequences for democratic governance and societal cohesion.
Divisiveness and Polarization: QAnon exacerbates societal divisions and polarization by promoting an "us versus them" mentality. It fosters suspicion and hostility toward perceived enemies, further fragmenting communities and undermining social cohesion.
Overall, the rise of the QAnon movement poses significant challenges to democratic societies, including the spread of misinformation, radicalization, erosion of trust in institutions, and exacerbation of societal divisions. Addressing these challenges requires a multifaceted approach involving education, media literacy, fact-checking, and efforts to counter extremist ideologies.
See:
COVID-19
The influence of Trump, QAnon, and right-leaning media on disinformation surrounding COVID-19 and vaccines was significant and multifaceted. Here are some ways in which they contributed to the spread of disinformation:
Promotion of Unproven Treatments: During the early stages of the pandemic, former President Donald Trump made statements promoting unproven treatments for COVID-19, such as hydroxychloroquine. This contributed to confusion and the spread of misinformation about effective treatments.
Minimization of the Severity of COVID-19: Trump and some right-leaning media outlets downplayed the severity of the virus, comparing it to the flu and suggesting that it was not as dangerous as public health experts were indicating. This led to a false sense of security and contributed to a lack of adherence to public health measures.
Skepticism Toward Public Health Measures: Trump and some conservative media figures expressed skepticism toward public health measures such as mask-wearing and social distancing. This skepticism influenced segments of the population, leading to resistance against recommended preventive measures.
Misinformation about Vaccines: QAnon and certain right-leaning media outlets spread misinformation and conspiracy theories about COVID-19 vaccines. False claims included suggestions that the vaccines contained tracking devices or altered DNA, which have been thoroughly debunked by scientific experts.
Polarization and Politicization of COVID-19 Response: The pandemic response became highly politicized, with views on preventive measures and vaccines often aligning with political affiliations. This polarization created an environment where disinformation could thrive, as individuals were more likely to accept information that aligned with their political beliefs.
Attack on Institutions and Experts: Some right-leaning media outlets and political figures undermined trust in public health institutions and experts, portraying them as untrustworthy or politically motivated. This erosion of trust contributed to the acceptance of alternative narratives and conspiracy theories.
Conspiracy Theories and False Narratives from QAnon: QAnon, a conspiracy theory movement, also played a role in spreading disinformation about COVID-19. Some QAnon followers embraced false narratives that linked the pandemic to a global conspiracy, further contributing to the spread of unfounded claims.
The combination of these factors created an environment where misinformation and disinformation could flourish, hindering efforts to control the spread of the virus and promote vaccination. Addressing these challenges requires a concerted effort involving accurate communication from public health authorities, media literacy initiatives, and efforts to build trust in science and evidence-based decision-making.
See:
"Stop the Steal" and "The Big Lie"
Disinformation played a significant role in fueling the "Stop the Steal" movement and perpetuating "The Big Lie" narrative that the 2020 presidential election was stolen from Donald Trump. Here's how disinformation contributed to these phenomena:
Baseless Claims of Voter Fraud: Disinformation campaigns spread false claims of widespread voter fraud in the 2020 election, despite there being no evidence to support these allegations. These false claims were amplified by Trump and his allies, as well as by right-leaning media outlets and online platforms. This disinformation contributed to the belief among some Trump supporters that the election was illegitimate and justified their efforts to challenge the results.
Misleading Narratives About Election Integrity: Disinformation campaigns promoted misleading narratives about election integrity, suggesting that the election was rife with irregularities and vulnerabilities that undermined its legitimacy. These narratives fueled distrust in the electoral process and provided a rallying cry for supporters of the "Stop the Steal" movement.
Social Media Amplification: Disinformation spread rapidly on social media platforms, where false claims and conspiracy theories about the election gained traction among certain segments of the population. These platforms served as echo chambers where disinformation could be amplified and reinforced, leading to the further polarization of public opinion.
Manipulation of Evidence: Disinformation campaigns often manipulated or misrepresented evidence to support the false narrative of voter fraud. This included the promotion of selectively edited videos, misleading statistics, and unsubstantiated allegations, which were shared widely on social media and other online platforms.
Promotion of Alternative Realities: Disinformation campaigns promoted alternative realities and conspiratorial explanations for Trump's electoral defeat, portraying him as the victim of a vast conspiracy involving political opponents, media organizations, and election officials. This narrative allowed supporters of "Stop the Steal" to justify their actions and beliefs, despite lacking credible evidence.
Overall, disinformation played a central role in fueling the "Stop the Steal" movement and perpetuating "The Big Lie" narrative that the 2020 election was stolen. By spreading false claims of voter fraud and promoting misleading narratives about election integrity, disinformation campaigns undermined trust in the electoral process and contributed to political polarization and social unrest.
Certain right-leaning media outlets played a significant role in amplifying and legitimizing the "Stop the Steal" movement and perpetuating "The Big Lie" narrative that the 2020 presidential election was stolen from Donald Trump. Here's how right-leaning media contributed to these phenomena:
Promotion of Voter Fraud Claims: Cerjtain right-leaning media outlets, including Fox News, Newsmax, and One America News Network (OANN), prominently featured claims of widespread voter fraud and irregularities in the 2020 election. These outlets provided a platform for Trump and his allies to amplify unfounded allegations of electoral malfeasance, despite there being no credible evidence to support these claims.
Echo Chamber Effect: Certain right-leaning media outlets served as echo chambers where false claims and conspiracy theories about the election could be amplified and reinforced. Viewers who primarily consumed news from these outlets were exposed to a steady stream of misinformation about voter fraud, which contributed to the widespread belief among some conservatives that the election was illegitimate.
Legitimization of Conspiracy Theories: Certain right-leaning media outlets legitimized conspiracy theories and unfounded claims about the election, giving them credibility and legitimacy in the eyes of their audience. By presenting these narratives as legitimate news stories, these outlets helped to mainstream fringe beliefs and alternative realities about the election outcome.
Undermining Trust in Mainstream Media and Institutions: Certain right-leaning media outlets played a role in undermining trust in mainstream media organizations and institutions that reported on the integrity of the election. They portrayed mainstream media coverage of the election as biased and untrustworthy, while presenting themselves as alternative sources of reliable information.
Fueling Political Polarization: Certain right-leaning media outlets contributed to political polarization by framing the election as a battle between Trump and the "deep state" or establishment forces. This narrative reinforced tribalistic tendencies among conservative audiences and fostered a sense of grievance and victimhood among Trump supporters.
Overall, certain right-leaning media outlets played a crucial role in shaping the narrative around the 2020 election and fueling the "Stop the Steal" movement and "The Big Lie" narrative. By promoting false claims of voter fraud, legitimizing conspiracy theories, and undermining trust in mainstream institutions, these outlets contributed to widespread misinformation and political polarization surrounding the election outcome.
See:
Trump and January 6th
The events of January 6th, 2021, when a violent mob stormed the United States Capitol, were the culmination of years of factors including the proliferation of alternative facts, disinformation campaigns, and foreign influence operations. Here's how these elements contributed to the events of that day:
Proliferation of Alternative Facts: In the years leading up to January 6th, there was a growing acceptance of alternative facts and a blurring of the lines between truth and falsehood. Political figures and media outlets, particularly those aligned with right-leaning or populist ideologies, increasingly promoted narratives that were not grounded in evidence or reality. This erosion of truth made it easier for false claims and conspiracy theories to gain traction among certain segments of the population.
Disinformation Campaigns: Disinformation campaigns, both domestic and foreign, played a significant role in shaping public opinion and sowing discord in the lead-up to January 6th. These campaigns spread false narratives about a wide range of topics, including the 2020 presidential election, COVID-19, and racial justice protests. By exploiting existing divisions and amplifying fringe beliefs, disinformation campaigns contributed to a climate of distrust, polarization, and political extremism.
Foreign Influence Operations: Foreign adversaries, particularly Russia, engaged in active measures to undermine American democracy and destabilize the political system. These efforts included spreading disinformation, amplifying divisive narratives, and exploiting social and political tensions. While the full extent of foreign influence on the events of January 6th is still being investigated, there is evidence to suggest that foreign actors played a role in amplifying false claims of election fraud and inciting violence.
Echo Chambers and Online Radicalization: The proliferation of social media and online platforms created echo chambers where individuals were exposed only to information that confirmed their pre-existing beliefs. These echo chambers facilitated the spread of disinformation and contributed to the radicalization of individuals who were increasingly isolated from mainstream sources of information. Online communities and forums provided a fertile breeding ground for extremist ideologies and conspiracy theories, leading to the mobilization of individuals who were willing to resort to violence to achieve their goals.
Overall, the events of January 6th were the result of a complex interplay of factors, including the proliferation of alternative facts, disinformation campaigns, foreign influence operations, and online radicalization. Addressing these underlying issues will require a concerted effort to promote truth, combat disinformation, strengthen democratic institutions, and foster a more informed and resilient society.
Trump's actions and rhetoric in the lead-up to the events have been widely criticized for inflaming tensions and contributing to the atmosphere of unrest that culminated in the attack on the Capitol.
Leading up to January 6th, Trump repeatedly and falsely claimed that the 2020 presidential election was stolen from him due to widespread voter fraud, despite there being no credible evidence to support these claims. He urged his supporters to "fight" and "take back our country" at a rally held near the White House on the morning of January 6th, just before Congress was set to certify the electoral college results.
During his speech at the rally, Trump encouraged his supporters to march to the Capitol and "show strength" in their efforts to overturn the election results. While Trump did not explicitly call for violence, his rhetoric and actions contributed to a charged atmosphere and emboldened the mob that later stormed the Capitol, resulting in chaos, destruction, and multiple deaths.
Following the events of January 6th, Trump faced criticism and impeachment charges for his role in inciting the insurrection. While he was ultimately acquitted by the Senate, many observers and lawmakers continue to hold him accountable for his actions leading up to and during the attack on the Capitol.
See: